Posted on

Fall Collection 2024

Articles Online
Fall Collection 2024

GAL Members – Login first before clicking on article titles to read the full articles.
Not a 2024 member? You can join or renew here.

 

Radiation from Lower Guitar Modes by Graham Caldersmith (1985)
▪ Caldersmith discusses the efficiency and pattern of sound radiation in the classic guitar produced by the four lower resonance modes, which he calls monopole, cross dipole, long dipole, and tripole.

Inside Pacific Rim Tonewoods by Steve McMinn (1993)
▪ McMinn’s lutherie wood business has turned out to be a pretty big deal. Here we gain perspective by seeing it at the very beginning.

The Great White Sitka by Jeffrey R. Elliott (1993)
▪ Holy Moby Spruce! How does one hack a log that’s eleven feet wide into 4000 guitar tops? Very carefully! By the way, this is a log that Steve McMinn rescued from the pulp mill.

Meet the Maker: Bernard Millant by Jonathon Peterson (2006)
▪ Millant is a violin maker, a bow maker, an appraiser, an author, and a man of high repute within the violin world. The depth of training behind many old-school fiddle people will astonish most guitar makers, and it makes for entrancing reading.

Meet the Maker: Dmitry Zhevlakov by Federico Sheppard (2007)
▪ This is not only the story of a Russian luthier who also makes beautiful rosettes for other builders, but is another example of how the Internet has changed the world — in this case for better.

Aluminum Sonatas: A Brief History of Aluminum Stringed Instruments in the Last 120 Years by James Condino (2007)
▪Every luthier knows how fickle and finicky the market is, so it’s no wonder that musical instruments made of aluminum didn’t catch on. Examined here are a violin, a mandolin, and a pair of bass viols. Fun stuff!

Mechanical Compliance for Soundboard Optimization by David Hurd (2007)
▪ Hurd believes that the fastest way to great instruments is science, and it’s hard to argue with such a rational man. His jigs measure the deflection of top plates while under tension, and once he carves the top and braces to the numbers he wants, he’s done. This could be math heavy, but he offers an Internet spread sheet to ease the pain.

Construction of the Colombian Tiple by Anamaria Paredes Garcia and R.M. Mottola (2007)
▪ Cross a 12-string flattop with a classical guitar and you get the Colombian tiple. The tiple has four courses of three steel strings, but on the inside, it’s a classical. Follow Alberto Paredes as he builds the instrument in this photo tour. See GAL Plan #51.

Meet the Maker: Mervyn Davis by Rodney Stedall (2007)
▪ Davis’ South African upbringing inspires a wonderful decorative sense in his instruments. He’s built a ton of different stuff but may end up best known for his wildly unique modular guitars called Smooth Talkers.

Cricket: A Reclaimed Salvage Recovery by James Condino (2007)
▪ Condino’s mandolin is made from recycled materials, mostly Douglas fir and katalox. It is unique and beautiful, and the story behind it is pretty cool, too.

Grading on the Curves: Fitting Bars and Bridges on Archtop Guitars by Steve Andersen (2007)
▪ This is a very detailed look at how a notable builder of archtop guitars fits tone bars and bridges to his instruments.

The Venezuelan Cuatro by Aquiles Torres (2008)
▪ Traditionally, this instrument is a small 4-string guitar with 14 frets clear, no frets over the body, a flush fretboard, and a large veneer tap plate. Note that the cuatro built for the article has 17 frets clear of the body. See GAL Plan #58.

The MacRostie Mandolin Deflection Jig by Don MacRostie (2008)
▪ MacRostie’s clever jig measures the top deflection of a carved mandolin under string load at any stage of its construction. It is a valuable tool within the reach of any luthier.

The “Corker” Guitar: A Sideport Experiment by Alan Carruth (2008)
▪ Carruth built a classical guitar with many small ports drilled in the side. By plugging the ports in various combinations he investigated the usefulness and physics behind them. Though this guitar did not make a believer out of him, he admits that his results are somewhat inconclusive.

Electric Guitar Setup by Erick Coleman and Elliot John-Conry (2009)
▪ Two disciples of Dan Erlewine explain the latest techniques of setting up the electric guitar. All the details and specs are there, as well as a bit of philosophy.

Dulcimer 101 by John Calkin (2009)
▪ Dulcimers are needlessly maligned and in need of advocates, and the author is a strong one. Tools and jiggery are kept to a minimum to make construction of this entry level instrument as accessible as possible.

The Guitar as a Structure and Some Practical Information on Bracing by James Blilie (2009)
▪ A structural engineer and guitar builder sees the guitar as a thing buffeted by forces and stresses.

Total Flame Out: Retopping a Harp Guitar by Harry Fleishman (2009)
▪ Harry replaces the failed soundboard on a complicated instrument with as little refinishing and other stress as possible.

Strings: The (Often) Forgotten Accessory by Fan Tao (2010)
▪ D’Addario's resident scientist Fan Tao helps us understand string issues in relation to custom instruments and customized tuning.

Practical Acoustics by Michael Cone (2010)
▪ Cone describes his advanced apparatus and method for acoustically testing classical guitars.

Meet the Maker: James Ham by Roger Alan Skipper (2010)
▪ Ham operates from a shop in Victoria, B.C. where he repairs and restores violin family instruments and constructs world class double basses.

It’s All About the Core or How to Estimate Compensation by Sjaak Elmendorp (2010)
▪ Mathematics and parameters used to address the problem of string compensation estimation.

Articles Online
Fall Collection 2024

Radiation from Lower Guitar Modes by Graham Caldersmith (1985)
▪ Caldersmith discusses the efficiency and pattern of sound radiation in the classic guitar produced by the four lower resonance modes, which he calls monopole, cross dipole, long dipole, and tripole.

Inside Pacific Rim Tonewoods by Steve McMinn (1993)
▪ McMinn's lutherie wood business has turned out to be a pretty big deal. Here we gain perspective by seeing it at the very beginning.

The Great White Sitka by Jeffrey R. Elliott (1993)
▪ Holy Moby Spruce! How does one hack a log that’s eleven feet wide into 4000 guitar tops? Very carefully! By the way, this is a log that Steve McMinn rescued from the pulp mill.

Meet the Maker: Bernard Millant by Jonathon Peterson (2006)
▪ Millant is a violin maker, a bow maker, an appraiser, an author, and a man of high repute within the violin world. The depth of training behind many old-school fiddle people will astonish most guitar makers, and it makes for entrancing reading.

Meet the Maker: Dmitry Zhevlakov by Federico Sheppard (2007)
▪ This is not only the story of a Russian luthier who also makes beautiful rosettes for other builders, but is another example of how the Internet has changed the world — in this case for better.

Aluminum Sonatas: A Brief History of Aluminum Stringed Instruments in the Last 120 Years by James Condino (2007)
▪ Every luthier knows how fickle and finicky the market is, so it’s no wonder that musical instruments made of aluminum didn’t catch on. Examined here are a violin, a mandolin, and a pair of bass viols. Fun stuff!

Mechanical Compliance for Soundboard Optimization by David Hurd (2007)
▪ Hurd believes that the fastest way to great instruments is science, and it’s hard to argue with such a rational man. His jigs measure the deflection of top plates while under tension, and once he carves the top and braces to the numbers he wants, he’s done. This could be math heavy, but he offers an Internet spread sheet to ease the pain.

Construction of the Colombian Tiple by Anamaria Paredes Garcia and R.M. Mottola (2007)
▪ Cross a 12-string flattop with a classical guitar and you get the Colombian tiple. The tiple has four courses of three steel strings, but on the inside, it’s a classical. Follow Alberto Paredes as he builds the instrument in this photo tour. See GAL Plan #51.

Meet the Maker: Mervyn Davis by Rodney Stedall (2007)
▪ Davis’ South African upbringing inspires a wonderful decorative sense in his instruments. He’s built a ton of different stuff but may end up best known for his wildly unique modular guitars called Smooth Talkers.

Cricket: A Reclaimed Salvage Recovery by James Condino (2007)
▪ Condino’s mandolin is made from recycled materials, mostly Douglas fir and katalox. It is unique and beautiful, and the story behind it is pretty cool, too.

Grading on the Curves: Fitting Bars and Bridges on Archtop Guitars by Steve Andersen (2007)
▪ This is a very detailed look at how a notable builder of archtop guitars fits tone bars and bridges to his instruments.

The Venezuelan Cuatro by Aquiles Torres (2008)
▪ Traditionally, this instrument is a small 4-string guitar with 14 frets clear, no frets over the body, a flush fretboard, and a large veneer tap plate. Note that the cuatro built for the article has 17 frets clear of the body. See GAL Plan #58.

The MacRostie Mandolin Deflection Jig by Don MacRostie (2008)
▪ MacRostie’s clever jig measures the top deflection of a carved mandolin under string load at any stage of its construction. It is a valuable tool within the reach of any luthier.

The “Corker” Guitar: A Sideport Experiment by Alan Carruth (2008)
▪ Carruth built a classical guitar with many small ports drilled in the side. By plugging the ports in various combinations he investigated the usefulness and physics behind them. Though this guitar did not make a believer out of him, he admits that his results are somewhat inconclusive.

Electric Guitar Setup by Erick Coleman and Elliot John-Conry (2009)
▪ Two disciples of Dan Erlewine explain the latest techniques of setting up the electric guitar. All the details and specs are there, as well as a bit of philosophy.

Dulcimer 101 by John Calkin (2009)
▪ Dulcimers are needlessly maligned and in need of advocates, and the author is a strong one. Tools and jiggery are kept to a minimum to make construction of this entry level instrument as accessible as possible.

The Guitar as a Structure and Some Practical Information on Bracing by James Blilie (2009)
▪ A structural engineer and guitar builder sees the guitar as a thing buffeted by forces and stresses.

Total Flame Out: Retopping a Harp Guitar by Harry Fleishman (2009)
▪ Harry replaces the failed soundboard on a complicated instrument with as little refinishing and other stress as possible.

Strings: The (Often) Forgotten Accessory by Fan Tao (2010)
▪ D'Addario's resident scientist Fan Tao helps us understand string issues in relation to custom instruments and customized tuning.

Practical Acoustics by Michael Cone (2010)
▪ Cone describes his advanced apparatus and method for acoustically testing classical guitars.

Meet the Maker: James Ham by Roger Alan Skipper (2010)
▪ Ham operates from a shop in Victoria, B.C. where he repairs and restores violin family instruments and constructs world class double basses.

It’s All About the Core or How to Estimate Compensation by Sjaak Elmendorp (2010)
▪ Mathematics and parameters used to address the problem of string compensation estimation.

Posted on

Not Only Cones Make It — and Cylinders Almost Do

Not Only Cones Make It — and Cylinders Almost Do

by F.A. Jaén

Originally published in American Lutherie #101, 2010



In the years since Tim Olsen’s article “Cylinders Don’t Make It” appeared in AL#8 (Winter 1986; also BRBAL1) the main ideas presented there have been accepted, developed, and finally, simplified and distorted. Many, including myself, remembered it more like “Only Cones Make It.”

The first indication that something in my ideas was wrong was when I made a CAD model of a fretboard some time ago. I wanted it to have a constant curvature radius of 300MM (around 12"). There are many customers that still want that, in spite of offering well-designed conical-shaped fingerboards. My first thought was to draw two circles, 12" diameter, one directly above the other, at the distance from nut to end. After that, I would trace two diverging straight lines connecting both circles and defining both the edges of the fretboard and the widths at its ends. The surface could then be generated by moving one of the edge lines towards the other, using the end circles as rail curves (what is known as a “sweep” command in many CAD packages).

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of the Articles Online featured on our website for Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 3 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

MEMBERS: login for access or contact us to setup your account.

Posted on

At the Outer Limits of Solid Geometry: The “Twisted Neck” Guitar

At the Outer Limits of Solid Geometry: The “Twisted Neck” Guitar

by Leo Burrell

Originally published in American Lutherie #12, 1987 and Big Red Book of American Lutherie Volume One, 2000



I was greatly amused by remembering my own struggles while reading the articles in AL#8 about the compound radius of the fretboard. I was actually practicing these techniques before knowing what a plain old radius is. I have only been in the music business since applying for patent letters for my naturally rotated (twisted) string assembly (all of the components that define the string alignment: nut, neck, bridge, top of the body). That was April 1984. And I never would have built an instrument at all, let alone carve a compound radius, if the “Music Moguls” had had any respect for my invention. But they didn’t, so I did.

I enclose a photograph of me holding an instrument I modified in June 1984. I shaped the neck from a solid block of cherry given to me by Dan Rowe, shop teacher at Western Beaver High School, Industry, Pennsylvania. I whittled and otherwise shaped it during evenings for about two weeks, using the kitchen counter for a workbench. Oddly enough, I roughly followed the procedure you described in your article “Cylinders Don’t Make It” to shape the fingerboard. However, in my case, the procedure was complicated by the approximate 45° rotation.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of the Articles Online featured on our website for Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 3 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

MEMBERS: login for access or contact us to setup your account.

Posted on

Letter: Technical Qualm with Jim Blilie’s Article in AL#100

Letter: Technical qualm with Jim Blilie’s article in AL #100

by Alan Carruth

Originally published in American Lutherie #101, 2010



Tim —

I really enjoyed AL#100. It’s a nice mix of “technoid,” “art,” and “craft” articles. Lots of good info, but I did see a couple of things I wanted to respond to.

First, in Jim Blilie’s article, which was excellent overall, I have a disagreement that rises above the level of minor. He says, on p. 31: “The fact that the relationship between stiffness (Young’s modulus) and density is inherently linear shows that just changing wood species doesn’t affect the stiffness-to-weight ratio very much.”

The problem with that is, while the lengthwise Young’s modulus (E) values for both hardwoods and softwoods tend to fall on straight lines, they are different lines, owing to differences in basic structure in the woods. I’ve been measuring the properties of wood samples for several years. I’m enclosing a graph of long grain E vs. density for most of the pieces I’ve measured so far (147 samples), with eyeballed “average” lines drawn in. The softwoods include all of the usual-suspect top woods, as well as white pine and Mediterranean cypress. As you can see, the points fall very close to a straight line toward the left side of the chart. The hardwoods include a lot of lutherie woods (most of the samples are Indian rosewood), and some others, with balsa and blackwood being the end points. As you can see, the scatter of the points is greater, but they do at least suggest a line. One could, of course, draw a single line that took in all of the data points, but at the cost of accepting quite a lot more scatter in the softwood data. Given the relative homogeneity of softwood structure, this seems unwarranted. Besides, the resulting line would not approach the origin at all closely, which would be illogical. As is, the hardwood line is in no way an extension of the softwood line. Balsa, and yew, ’way down on the left, overlap the softwood area, as do a few of the softer hardwoods, such as butternut. Still, compared with the softwoods, hardwoods tend to have higher density for the equivalent E value.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Opinion

Opinion

by Keith Hill

Originally published in American Lutherie #63, 2000



Everyone who practices an art, a craft, or a profession belongs to only one of two groups: Those who love the art, craft, or profession; or those who love being involved in the art, craft, or profession. That which distinguishes these two groups is that those in the latter group are in love with the idea of being an artist, craftsman, or professor while those in the former love the art itself.

What does this have to do with being a musical instrument maker? Everything. The art and craft of the professional instrument maker hinges on knowing how to reliably produce a musical instrument which equals in every way the quality of the best that has gone before. To deny this reality makes a farce of the whole business. Why? Because if you replace the words “musical instrument maker” with the word “chef” (as in gourmet cook) and the words “musical instrument” with the word “food,” no one would quibble with that statement. Since musical instruments produce sound which the ears “eat,” I see no difference (nor did Mattheson who used the same metaphor in discussing music back in the 18th century) in how the standards of quality should apply. Yet, the field of professional musical instrument making is plagued with the attitude that “because we don’t know and can’t know how the great instruments from the past were made, we do the best we can and focus our attention on what we can do well” which, unfortunately, means building instruments that appeal to the eye and not to the ear. No one would hire an engineer to build a bridge who had that attitude. No one would hire a chef who had that attitude, much less want to eat anything cooked up by such person. Yet, in the field of music, such an attitude is normal.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.