Posted on

Letter: How the GAL Got Started

Letters and more from our readers Originally published in American Lutherie #152, July 2024   Tim — In 1946 I entered the 7th grade, which was then known as junior high school. It was an OK experience, but it was made particularly interesting by an activity called “Industrial Arts.” I had a fine instructor who taught us […]

This post is only available to members.
Posted on

Reflections on my Career

Reflections on My Career

by J.R. Beall

Originally published in Guild of American Luthiers Quarterly 6, #1, 1978



This year of 1978 will mark my tenth anniversary as a practitioner of the luthier’s art. Those of us who have engaged in any profession for a longish period of time like to think that we have gained insight regarding that profession and, though such an assumption may be debatable, there is no doubt that we are more than willing to give advice to all and sundry who will listen. Being no less human than the rest and having evolved, over the years, the motto that, “Tis better to bore than be bored,” I shall proceed herewith.

A decade ago, we were considerably fewer in number. There was, of course, no G.A.L. and much less information about the craft. Sloane’s first book, Classic Guitar Construction, had just been released and it was a real boon to many who were trying to make a beginning. I built my first guitar with only a copy of “Guitar Review” No. 28 as a guide. I wasn’t really such a bad set of instructions, but it wasn’t meant as a how-to-build essay and much was missing. At any rate, most of us know what a tremendous thrill that first guitar is. To actually hold in one’s hands the result of so much thought and effort, to experience the consummation of a truly difficult and challenging creative act is, in a very real sense, a personal triumph. Most of us will look back on that first instrument with some embarrassment for its crudity and its faults, but no matter how skilled or accomplished we may become in subsequent years, the completion of that first “#1” is an all time high. I have built only about fifteen guitars during my career. I find them to be the most difficult of all the instruments I have attempted and financially comparatively unrewarding. It has been my observation that to become a truly competitive guitar builder, one needs to have built something like a hundred instruments or had a truly excellent teacher. This is not to say that the first one hundred guitars may not be very good and quite saleable, but only that the complexity of the task requires a very long and arduous apprenticeship. The unfortunate part is that usually, after half a dozen or fewer instruments, most of us feel that we are professionally ready for the market place. We fantasize glorious and financially successful careers and many make major changes in their lives to accommodate this new vocation. After another ten or fifteen guitars, the realization begins to dawn that we know very little about this very complex and sophisticated instrument and, what is even more discouraging, that we are probably unable even to achieve as good a finish as is common on commercial instruments selling for $200–$300. Our biggest problem is that no one has explained that there is simply no substitute for serving one’s time. The construction of a guitar in the Ramírez, Kohno, or Martin steel string class requires at least much knowledge and experience as is necessary of a candidate for a PhD. in any of the professions and the time requirement must be roughly equivalent as well. If one is willing to give seven or eight years to the learning process and has a sufficient natural talent as well, the glories and riches of the master luthier may be attained... but no less will do. I don’t mean to discourage those earnest aspirants to the luthier’s art, but only to inject a realistic note. I know, personally, several master luthiers. I know a great many guitar builders, but only a few who are truly competitive with the “name brands” and they have all served their time. Most of the successful ones became that way because they were driven. They have worked long and hard to achieve true quality. It seems to me that of late I have encountered more and more would-be luthiers, particularly dulcimer makers, who have taken up the craft as a means of avoiding an ordinary job or profession. Needless to say, such people have a somewhat more casual approach to building and it can be predicted that they are not likely to become professional. It is impossible to stress too strongly the necessity for a professional attitude toward what we do!

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

How to Become a Running Dog of the Capitalist Imperialist Music Mongers (and love it!)

How to Become a Running Dog

of the Capitalist Imperialist Music Mongers (and love it!)

by J.R. Beall

Originally published in Guild of American Luthiers Newsletter, Volume 3 #2, 1975



I’ve just finished re-reading R.E. Bruné’s last article on making it as a luthier and on most points we are in agreement. On the matter of commercial sales, however, I’m not as stuffy as R.E. and must admit that a good portion of my income is derived therefrom. R.E. is a purist and I can admire him for his willingness to live the austere life, sleeping on his workbench and eating puree of spruce shavings and rosewood dust. I am, by his standards, decadent beyond redemption, with a legal wife, a comfortable home, and plenty of expensive grub, but I offer no apologies, I am disgustingly satisfied with my life-style and have no difficulty justifying my comfortable existence.

In my opinion, the biggest problem with any one-man operation in our line of work, is that it is just physically impossible to turn out a sufficient number of any kind of instrument in any given time period, to earn as much as any average factory worker. For example, a good guitar builder, working alone can build one guitar every two weeks. That adds up to 24 per year, times $600.00 = $14,400.00 annual gross. That sounds pretty good to most of us but remember he must then pay for his materials, his maintenance and utilities, his traveling and advertising, taxes and the rest. If he can net $8,500. after expenses, he is doing well and we all must agree that in these times $8,500. is not big money.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Dulcimers as a Business (or Running Dogs, Part 2)

Dulcimers as a Business (or Running Dogs, Part 2)

from his 1975 GAL Convention lecture

by J.R. Beall

Originally published in Guild of American Luthiers Newsletter, Volume 3 #4, 1975



I believe that a luthier ought to be able to make a living at what he does, if at all possible.

I build dulcimers in the summertime starting (depending on how I feel after Christmas) February, maybe March. Every year I design and put out a new model, and that’s purely to alleviate the boredom, with also an eye toward improving the breed a little bit. It will last up until fall, maybe September, October by the time I finish building dulcimers, and by that time I’m ready to finish building dulcimers. Then I go on to building other things.


Folk Philosophy

I think to me at least, it seems the important thing about an instrument is that it plays and sounds well. If one spends too much time in decoration, you get into a financial situation where you can’t afford to sell it for the amount of time you’ve got into it. And again, this is my basic philosophy: To build things and build them well, and yet build them fast enough that you can make a pretty good living doing it.

Now, there are probably some other people who’ve built dulcimers fairly rapidly. But frequently you can see signs of that in the inferior quality of the product.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Harpsichord Basics

Harpsichord Basics

by J.R. Beall

Originally published in Guild of American Luthiers Newsletter Volume 1, #2, 1973



Almost since the beginning of my career as a luthier, I have been obsessed with the desire to build harpsichords. My inclinations were, however, met with a great deal of difficulty resultig from the fact that in my part of the country, harpshichords and their makers are rare.

After quite a long period of dilligent investigation, I did manage to compile a list of information on the subject and was able, successfully, to build my first instrument.

The completion of my own scratchbuilt harpsichord was one of the most exciting and satisfying occurences of my career as a luthier, and I recommend it highly to those of you with similar aspirations.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.