Posted on

Resurrecting the Family Banjo

Resurrecting the Family Banjo

by John Calkin

Originally published in American Lutherie #84, 2005 and Big Red Book of American Lutherie Volume Seven, 2015



Though the title says banjo, this could as easily be about any stringed instrument. We’ve all seen them, the family “heirloom” that some relative has decided deserves to be played again, perhaps because they think it will be cheaper than buying a comparable new one, but more likely for some sentimental reason. The number of such beaters you actually get to work on may vary with your locality. Sentimentality didn’t count for much in New Jersey, and I had a collection of junky guitars that had been abandoned once the concerned relative learned what the cost of resurrection would be. Virginians, on the other hand, seem to put more stock in sentimentality and I’ve had the chance to rebuild several instruments that probably weren’t worth the fee I charged.

Though this is about restoring an instrument to playability, please understand that we’re not talking about restoration as a vintage specialist would understand it. That sort of restoration often requires specialized knowledge and may demand a lot of research as well as the exchange of hefty sums of cash. It’s not much fun, either, unless you suffer a certain type of personality. In fact, some of what you and your customer may decide to do may interfere with future restoration, so it pays to have some idea of what’s collectable and what’s not.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of the Articles Online featured on our website for Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. For details, visit the membership page.

MEMBERS: login for access or contact us to setup your account.

Posted on

Letter: Note to Future Repairers of His Instruments

Letter: Note to Future Repairers of His Instruments

by Bob Gleason

Originally published in American Lutherie #101, 2010



Tim —

For the past thirty-eight years I’ve been repairing stringed instruments and building a few along the way, too. Occasionally, I’ve run into difficult repair situations. Some natural, like the freak wind gust through the window that blew a Martin 000-41 body off my bench, which resulted in my introduction to doing abalone purfling work. Some man-made, like the first Taylor guitar that was brought to me for a neck reset. No one told me there was a bolt under that label on the neck block. I’d never seen a solid wood guitar with a bolt-on neck. I thought bolts were for banjos! I steamed away like mad on that neck until I managed to break the heel off and discovered the bolt. Any experienced repairperson has a few interesting stories to tell.

Today things are getting worse, from a repair point of view. We have bolts, screws, epoxy, superglue, many kinds of white and yellow glues, gorilla glue, synthetic materials used throughout, water base finishes, quite a few concoctions of oil finishes, truss rods of all kinds, myriad electronics, woods from all parts of the planet, real shell, fake shell, semi-fake shell, photo finishes, stainless fretwire, laminated wood that looks like solid wood, instruments that are constructed with materials that were previously only found in the sink cut-out dumpster of the local cabinet shop, real bone, fake bone, and all sorts of other animal parts to name a few. Repair work is getting a little tougher these days!

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Letter: Instrument Resurrection Stories

Letter: Instrument Resurrection Stories

by John Calkin

Originally published in American Lutherie #96, 2008



Hello Tim and Everyone in GAL Land —

I’ve been receiving some interesting e-mails lately having to do with the instrument resurrection stories I wrote. They’re not so much about the repair issues, but about work ethics and dealing with customers, as well as the stresses of overwork and handling burnout.

Anyone busy enough to feel overworked at this point in time should only feel grateful. During the fifteen years I ran my own shop in New Jersey I serviced most of a county and four music stores and drew customers from both the NYC and Philly metropolitan areas, but forty hours of work in a week was a rarity. I had good uses for the down time, but more work would have been nice.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Letter: Patents and Acknowledgement

Letter: Patents and Acknowledgement

by Harry Fleishman

Originally published in American Lutherie #81, 2005



Dear Tim, GAL members, and anyone else,

Largely because of my involvement in GAL, I have some visible presence in the lutherie community. Because I have always been interested in solving the problems, imagined or real, that I saw in conventional instruments — whether that meant developing a more repair-and-adjust-friendly neck joint or trying to wring a stronger low end from my basses without introducing too much “twang” — I've preferred to take risks, accept failure, and appreciate occasional success. Additionally, and most importantly, I have worked hard over the thirty years I have been designing and building to maintain my integrity as a luthier, if nowhere else in my misbegotten life. (Bear with me, I’ll get to the point.)

It is, therefore, with some consternation and much sadness that I have heard rumors questioning the legitimacy of my use of some of these unusual features. To be blunt, I’ve heard accusations that I have ripped people off for their ideas and not given appropriate credit, either in the form of acknowledgment or, in some cases, in the form of required licensing fees.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Questions: Charity Lutherie

Questions: Charity Lutherie

by Brian Flaherty

Originally published in American Lutherie #98, 2009

 

Christ Kacoyannkis from Springfield, Illinois asks:

I am an amateur luthier and I donated the last instrument I made to a charity. Can I deduct the value of the instrument on my taxes, or only the cost of materials?


Brian Flaherty, research librarian at the New England School of Law in Boston, Massachusetts
responds:

Although I, like the GAL, cannot offer tax or legal advice, I can suggest the book The Tax Law of Charitable Giving by Bruce R. Hopkins, which includes this:

“An individual may make a contribution to a charitable organization of an item of property that was created by the donor, such as a painting or manuscript. The charitable deduction for this type of gift is not based on the fair market value of the property; instead, it is confined to the donor’s cost basis in the property. This tax result is occasioned by [IRC section 170(e)(1)(A)].”

The exception to this is if it’s your stock in trade — if it’s your business. Then you do have “fair market valuation” — which is the “price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller” (the language the court always uses to define “fair market valuation”). ◆