Posted on July 8, 2024October 1, 2024 by Dale Phillips Parametric Solid Modeling Software for Stringed Instrument Design Parametric Solid Modeling Software for Stringed Instrument Design by R.M. Mottola Originally published in American Lutherie #87, 2006 Most folks are awed when first witnessing a Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine shaping an instrument part. Since such a demonstration makes the advantages of using this technology immediately obvious, a number of people look into acquiring these tools for their own use. A substantial portion quickly loses interest when finding out the depth of complexity of the tools needed to design and build in this manner. Computer Aided Design (CAD) software must be mastered in order to draw the parts. Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) software must be mastered in order to specify how the drawings will be utilized in the machining process and to control the CNC machine. And the details of the CNC machine itself must be comprehended before real work can be performed. All of this conspires to lead all but the highly technical and/or highly motivated to the conclusion that these technologies need to be made a lot simpler and more accessible before they can be widely exploited in the industry. Adaptation and use of these technologies can be considered analogous to that of the automobile. When first introduced, the car was something only accessible to those who could understand all of the details of the machine (and repair all the parts, too), but eventually it evolved into a more commodity-like device that is usable with little or no knowledge of its inner workings. This article is an introduction to Parametric Solid Modeling (PSM), an existing second-generation CAD technology that offers potential to bring the benefits of CAD/CAM/CNC to a wider user base. A comprehensive library of parametric models of instrument parts and subassemblies could go a long way toward making these technologies generally accessible. The availability of such a library could render a number of aspects of instrument design to sequences of preparing simple drawings and filling in values in forms. No such library currently exists, but it is possible and likely that one could be developed. Folks working with PSM software in this industry undoubtedly have developed such models for their own use. I have some of my own and will use one as an example of how this technology works. Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article This article is part of the Articles Online featured on our website for Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 3 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page. MEMBERS: login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on July 8, 2024October 1, 2024 by Dale Phillips Post-Toronto Reflections Post-Toronto Reflections by Jeffrey R. Elliott Originally published in Guild of American Luthiers Quarterly 6, #3, 1978 The Canadian-hosted classic guitar festival “Guitar ’78” has left me with several vivid impressions, some of which I felt might merit hearing through the Guild Quarterly. The range and scope of this event was extensive, and to merely remain with the pace was exhausting. While I had hoped to experience something of several other events also scheduled, I soon discovered that to participate in all the luthiers’ happenings meant to forego nearly every other event on the program. With the scheduled four hours of the guitar makers’ workshop each day, meals, the evening concerts, and precious little sleep, any shop talk or visiting with other luthiers meant overlapping with other classes and events. An expected sacrifice from my “Guitar ’75” experience, but extensive and exhausting nonetheless. Of the 600 or so in attendance perhaps 10% were luthiers: having some 60 luthiers around for 24 hours a day, every day for a week, as well as the scheduled 20 hours of lecture-discussion, rendered me totally susceptible and helpless, and I became absorbed in that unique blend of professional and social camaraderie experienced during both the 1977 G.A.L. convention and the “Guitar ’75” festival. Some fine friendships, and solid professional relationships as well, have had their beginnings at these events. The 1978 G.A.L. Convention/Exhibition and the Carmel Classic Guitar Festival ought to round out this year nicely. Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article This article is part of the Articles Online featured on our website for Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 3 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page. MEMBERS: login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on July 7, 2024October 2, 2024 by Dale Phillips The Luthier’s Library The Luthier’s Library by Fred Battershell Originally published in Guild of American Luthiers Quarterly, Volume 3, #5 & #6, 1975 The Successful Craftsman — Making Your Craft Your Business by Alex Bealer Published by Barre Publishing Distributed by Crown Publishers, New York 288 pp. $9.95 Here is a book that promises a great deal and delivers nothing of lasting value; and in so doing, manages to betray it’s author’s profession: advertising. Yes, fellow luthiers, here is ad executive Alex Bealer telling you how to gain fame and fortune from your chosen craft. The blurb on the inside jacket cover of this book modestly advises the reader that this book... “answers some very tough questions facing the artist/merchant.” Questions such as how to find suppliers, how to market your product, how to price your wares, and where to work are alleged to be answered completely in this book. They are not. Like so much of the products produced by the advertising industry, this book is actually a systematic collection of half-truths and some very half-answers. Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article This article is part of the Articles Online featured on our website for Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 3 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page. MEMBERS: login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on July 7, 2024October 2, 2024 by Dale Phillips Smokies Dulcimer Convention Smokies Dulcimer Convention by Vicki Runnion Originally published in Guild of American Luthiers Quarterly, 5, #3, 1977 My good friends at the Folk Life Center of the Smokies, in Cosby, Tennessee, got together with some folks (now new friends from the Guild of American Luthiers and the publishers of Dulcimer Players News, and co-sponsored what I hope was the first of many annual dulcimer conventions there. The beautiful wooded Folk Life Center land n Cosby was the site for a weekend (June 10-12) full of music and other delights. Players, builders and lovers of both the plucked mountain dulcimer and the hammered dulcimer came from near and far (Florida, New York, Michigan, Ohio, Colorado, etc.) to celebrate the dulcimer. Performer Bonnie Carol won the understanding laughter of the audience late Saturday evening, with a song (composed by friends of hers) that poked gentle fun at people who still manage to hold on to the view of the dulcimer as merely an uncomplicated traditional instrument capable of only the simplest style of playing. Had any of these people been with us this weekend, I’m sure they myth would have been exploded. Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article This article is part of the Articles Online featured on our website for Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 3 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page. MEMBERS: login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on July 1, 2024July 9, 2024 by Dale Phillips Letter: Defending Larry Sandberg’s Book Letter: Defending Larry Sandberg’s Book by Harry Fleishman Originally published in American Lutherie #67, 2001 Dear Guild, Benjamin Hoff takes what seems like a pretty severe dislike to my friend Larry Sandberg’s book, The Acoustic Guitar Guide, from its title, to its tone, to its content. What many have enjoyed, the folksy tone Larry takes, offends Hoff. He’s certainly entitled to dislike it. However, he seems intent on nitpicking as a way of discrediting the author and his work. He quotes Sandberg and brackets “sic” after “epitome” as though the word or idea were used incorrectly, and he knew better. But the word and idea are correct as a quick glance at a dictionary will show. He objects to a brief history, but this is not a history book. He objects that Sandberg writes, “the steel-strung flattop is probably the kind of guitar you want. It’s the kind of guitar most people want.” Of course Sandberg is not psychic, but even a quick look at any store that sells guitars will show this to be true. The sales of steel-strung to nylon, or to any other kind is about ten to one. I think the problem is that Hoff doesn’t agree. He is entitled to that opinion, too. However, he neglects to write that in his discussion of classical guitars, Sandberg explains why one would or would not want a nylon strung guitar, who uses them, and what they do and don’t provide musically. I think that is sufficient. Hoff writes that the chapter about flattop guitars should be designated “factory” guitars. Yet, Sandberg writes separately about custom and handbuilt guitars. (Full disclosure: Two of my guitars are on the cover of this book and I’m very proud of that. Also, as a friend of Larry’s and a sometime author, I know the depth of his knowledge as well as the limitations, constraints, and hype-oriented zeal of the publishing world.) Certainly, the subtitle is a bit over the top. That’s publishing, folks. No book could be everything to all people and Hoff’s right: the subtitle shouldn’t say it can. That said, I think this one does what it purports: it guides potential players towards a guitar and helps guitar owners to maintain their instruments. As a reviewer myself I would not wish to see Hoff or anyone else censored in their reviews, nor to see only positive reviews. Sandberg’s book has received many other positive reviews. I disagree with Hoff’s assessment and wanted to add my voice to that discussion. ◆
