Posted on

Devolution of the Modern Lute

Devolution of the Modern Lute

by Robert Cooper

from his 1984 GAL Convention lecture

Originally published in American Lutherie #4, 1985 and Big Red Book of American Lutherie, Volume One, 2000



The other way to do it is with a dovetail extension on the neck, which slides into the block. But that is not really the historical way. Here again, we’re getting back to the historical method, and it seems to be perfectly adequate.

It is common in old lutes to use no tail block whatever. Also, a lute has no edge binding or lining; the top is simply glued right to the rib. The bracing of the lute top is almost entirely composed of transverse bars, with just a J-shape bar and two smaller bars behind the bridge. The transverse bars run directly across the instrument and are butted and glued directly to the sides.

The grain of those transverse bars is horizontal; it runs parallel to the top. You may wonder why in the world didn’t they do it logically, like guitar builders, and run it vertically. The probable reason is that when you make a lot of lutes you have a lot of top wood left over from pieces that you broke. Vertical grain top scraps would make horizontal grain braces. Also, if you split braces out of a billet, they split better this way than otherwise. These braces are rather high. The main brace is a little over an inch tall, by maybe 5MM. They are quite substantial, so the fact that the grain runs flat does not pose a strength problem.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

New Directions in Violin Making

New Directions in Violin Making

by Joseph Curtin

from his 2008 GAL Convention lecture

Originally published in American Lutherie #97, 2009



I started violin making as a frustrated player. My viola teacher’s husband was a viola maker, and at some point I just switched rooms. Otto Erdesz was his name, and he was a kind of crazy genius. I had a very informal education with him, which I realize now was good in some ways. He used to say, “If you take my advice, you do what you want.” The first instrument I made was a viola based on an asymmetrical model of his which had the upper bout cut away so you could reach higher positions. It seemed like a very good idea. He made about twenty of them, and then got frustrated at the resistance of musicians. Just the fact that it was different was a disadvantage.

I moved into traditional violin making, which means more or less making copies of instruments from the 17th and 18th centuries. Trying to do that well, trying to do that in a beautiful way and a faithful way and a way that sounds good, is an absolutely fascinating technical challenge. It’s very useful to have the limits provided by these traditions. But after twenty years I started to feel that making another Guarneri copy was a little boring. My mother is a painter and my father is a photographer, so I come from a visual arts background. In the visual arts, the general idea is to do something different each time. It would be embarrassing to do the same painting twice. With crafts, there’s an emphasis on repetition of forms. I think there can be a balance between those approaches in instrument making. And I think there is much more openness now to new design ideas among violin makers, and I’m sure among guitar makers too.

I’ll show the work of various makers, including myself. I don’t want to give the impression that this is a major movement. It’s small, but hopefully it will grow. It’s fun to spend some of your time following your imagination as much as the traditions.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

What You Should Know About The Hardanger Fiddle

What You Should Know About

The Hardanger Fiddle

by David Golber

Previously published in American Lutherie #36, 1993 and The Big Red Book of American Lutherie, Volume Three, 2004



Someone has walked into your shop with yet another weird instrument. This time, it’s sort of like a violin, but it has a whole lot of pegs, the top is carved funny, it has pearl and bone inlay, and it’s decorated with flowery drawings. He says his grandfather brought it from Norway in 1890, and he wants you to put it in playing condition.

Well, it’s a Hardanger fiddle (hardingfele in Norwegian). The instrument originated in the area around the Hardanger fjord, whence its name. It is distinctly Norwegian; in fact, it is played in only about a quarter of Norway, the western and south-central areas. The oldest instrument found has a date of 1651. The musical tradition is still very much alive, and continues unbroken up to the present.

Beginning in about 1850, there was an absolutely enormous emigration from Norway to America — something like a third of the population. Those who played fiddle of course brought their fiddles with them. In addition there were tours by professional players who performed for their emigrated countrymen and then returned to Norway. But the instrument and the music died out in America. The children of the immigrants rarely learned to play, and father’s fiddle lay in its case in the attic, or was hung on the wall like an icon of a lost era. Now there is something like a revival here in America, not only among the descendants of the immigrants, but also among those not of Norwegian ancestry who have discovered the music.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

The Hammered Dulcimer: Ancient, Wonderful, and Still Evolving

The Hammered Dulcimer: Ancient, Wonderful, and Still Evolving

by Sam Rizzetta

from his 1984 GAL Convention lecture

previously published in American Lutherie #10, 1987 and The Big Red Book, Volume 1, 2000



The dulcimer has been a strange, fascinating, and unique instrument in my life. I remember sitting at the knees of my uncle when I was three years old, listening to him play the banjo. That was just the most wonderful thing in the whole world. My mother lost a lot of pots and pans and other hardware to experimental childish banjos. I don’t remember if any of them actually yielded beautiful music, but they were a lot of fun. I couldn’t afford musical instruments, so if I wanted to play a banjo or guitar or whatever, I had to go down in the basement and knock one together. And that grew into a living building those things. When I finally heard a hammered dulcimer about twenty years ago, that was it; that was the most magical sound I’d heard in my life. It’s been downhill ever since.

Although the dulcimer is very ancient in its history, it never really reached a peak of fixed design as did the violin and, to a lesser extent, the guitar. Any good violin serves any purpose that you would want to put a violin to. A guitar is a bit less universal, with the many varieties such as classical, flamenco, jazz, and flattop. Still, there is a certain uniformity to them, and they’re usually tuned identically. Not so with the dulcimer. Although it is well known and loved in many cultures, there’s a great diversity in the tuning, construction, and tone.

There’s a lot of confusion over the name “dulcimer.” It really relates to the large trap­ezoidal instrument. The fretted instrument that many of us in recent times have called “dulcimer” truly is not a dulcimer at all but is related to the Pennsylvania German instrument called zitter (or zither) which in turn is related to the German scheitholdt. We are now very certain that all of the small plucked fretted “dulcimers” come direc­tly from those. These fretted instruments are often called Appalachian dulcimer or mountain dulcimer or plucked dulcimer or lap dulcimer, but all those names apply to both instruments. In fact, in the Appalachians, the hammered dulcimer was a little more common than the fretted one, which was just revived by folklorists a little earlier. The fretted instrument is sometimes struck with straws or beaters, or it may even be bowed. The hammered instrument in many cultures is only plucked but it is still called a dulcimer. These days, to make the distinction clear we’re calling the smaller instrument a fretted dulcimer and the larger trapezoidal one a dulcimer, the term that has referred to it through history.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Meet the Maker: Douglas Martin

Meet the Maker: Douglas Martin

by Barbara Goldowsky

previously published in American Lutherie #90, 2007



The violin is about the only man-made device that is made today exactly as it has been for the past 300 years. Now, finally, a revolution may be under way, according to Joseph Curtin of Ann Arbor, Michigan, the craftsman who just recently was awarded the first MacArthur Fellowship ever granted to a violin maker.

The cause of his startling statement is a balsa-wood violin that produces the powerful sound and excellent response everyone in the profession strives for. The unusual instrument’s creator is Douglas Martin, an amateur maker from Maine, who first introduced it to colleagues in July 2004. Since then, Mr. Martin’s work has sparked such enthusiasm that a special “Festival of Innovation” has been added to the Violin Society of America’s upcoming convention, from November 10–13, in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.

The new program’s goal is “to explore the future evolution of the violin — to inspire makers to follow their creative dreams wherever they may lead,” according to Fan Tao, a research scientist and a director of the VSA. In the society’s most recent newsletter, Mr. Curtin, also a director, claims that the traditional violin is “obsolete,” and urges members to “judge for yourself — join in the arguments, hoot or applaud — but don’t let the revolution start without you!”

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.