Posted on

Letter: C.F. Martin Stories

Letter: C.F. Martin Stories

by Frederick C. Lyman, Jr.

Originally published in American Lutherie #93, 2008

 

Dear Tim, Deb, and Bon,

Your recent article about Chris Martin interested me because I used to hang out at the Martin company when I was just getting started. They had a celebrated scrap pile which was a great source of less-than-perfect wood (but not by much — they had very high standards). I learned a lot from their designer at the time, John Huber. He knew a lot and served as a public relations person to deal with the constant stream of admiring visitors, like me.

In those days their old original factory was used mostly for storage. The three stories were laden with wonderful highly figured rosewood blanks. One day in 1972 they just said “OK, come and get it. We need the space.” People came and literally trucked it all away. The hard part was schlepping it down the stairs.

About that same time the Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Classic Guitar Society sponsored a classic guitar recital by Oscar Ghiglia at Muhlenberg College. I sat there with a name tag on my lapel, and in the next seat was an elderly gentleman. It was clear that he had been partaking of fine vintages with his dinner. He looked at my name tag and his own and he just could not get over the similarity. “You are Frederick C. Lyman and I am C. Frederick Martin!” He said this over and over, as if dumbstruck, unable to articulate the coincidence.

The one lesson I should have taken away from C.F. Martin, but didn’t, was to place paramount importance on dust control and removal. They knew that sooner or later everyone who breathes that stuff gets sick.

As always, congratulations on the quality and consistency of American Lutherie magazine.

Posted on

Questions: Instrument Plan #33

Questions: Instrument Plan #33

by R.E. Bruné

Originally published in American Lutherie #101, 2010

 

Joe Franklin of Whitesburg, Tennessee asks:

Regarding GAL Instrument Plan #33 (1937 Hauser by R.E. Bruné): Are the depth dimensions as annotated on the back view the inside or outside dimensions?


Plan author R.E. Bruné of Evanston, Illinois
answers:

The side measurements given around the circumference of the instrument are the measurements I took of the total outside dimensions at those points, so one would have to subtract the specific top and back thicknesses at those points to arrive at the actual side dimensions prior to cutting the purfling/banding channels. For those making replicas, getting this correct within ±1MM would suffice in my opinion, but I know the favorite pastime of luthiers is splitting hairs and arguing over which is the bigger half. Actually, I suspect the original dimensions may have been slightly bigger by about .25MM to .5MM but have retracted due to shrinkage. There is nothing in the side assembly that would prevent the sides from shrinking from dryness, and they are just about crack-free because of this. It seemed to me that the instrument was originally built under fairly high humidity conditions, or at least part of it. The back has no arch left in it, probably because of shrinkage; this is also a question I have been frequently asked. I drew the instrument as is, where is, with no attempt to “correct” what I thought might have been the original state. I leave this to other scholars.

Posted on

Letter: Learning From D’Aquisto and Maccaferri

Letter: Learning From D’Aquisto and Maccaferri

by John Monteleone

Originally published in American Lutherie #63, 2000



Tim –

My earliest influence must have been my father, a Renaissance man before I understood what the term meant. He was a classically-trained sculptor, a trade which was falling out of favor by the 1950s, when he had to support and raise four children. His resourcefulness led him to run his own pattern making company.

As a little kid I watched him for hours on end as he worked in clay and plaster. I paid close attention to his hands. I was tuned in to people’s hands at a young age. I couldn’t help but notice what creative hands were capable of doing. Some of my dad’s friends were also artists, so I was in this interesting atmosphere of paint, clay, glass, ceramics, pottery, and sculpture. And then I learned the craft of pattern making in my father’s shop. I soaked up everything like a camera and a sponge.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.
Posted on

Questions: Single String That is Too Sharp

Questions: Single String That is Too Sharp

by Neil Kok

Originally published in American Lutherie #102, 2010

 

Neil Kok from Finland adds his answer to the question in AL #100 about problems with a single string that is too sharp:

I was interested in John Calkin’s answer about modifying the saddle to remedy a guitar string that is too sharp. I have an example from one of my own guitars that may complement John’s answer with another solution. If the nut is not made exactly correctly, the string may not rest on the front edge of the nut but farther back, or even on its back edge. If the gap between nut and string is small enough, this may cause a sitar-like clatter and call our attention to the nut. But if there’s no clatter we may not notice this at all, and wonder why the string is sharp. I just filed a bit at the groove for the B string, giving it the right form, and the guitar plays beautifully in tune now.

Posted on

Questions: Liquid Hide and White Glue

Questions: Liquid Hide and White Glue

by Dale Zimmerman

Originally published in American Lutherie #101, 2010



JM from the Internet asks:

Both liquid hide glue and white glue are reviled by a lot of luthiers, but I suspect that a lot of highly regarded instruments were made using these glues, since these were widely used before yellow glue was invented. This makes me want to take a more objective look at these glues. Does anyone have a comprehensive comparison of the qualities of these glues and also of hot hide glue and yellow glue?


Dale Zimmerman from Franklin International in Columbus, Ohio responds:

As JM suggested, there are clearly differences between the various types of glue, and luthiers have learned to especially appreciate the characteristics of hot hide glue and yellow glue and feel less comfortable with liquid hide glue and white glue. With that in mind, it might be good to start with the fact that there is almost no difference in strength between the various categories of products.

Become A Member to Continue Reading This Article

This article is part of our premium web content offered to Guild members. To view this and other web articles, join the Guild of American Luthiers. Members also receive 4 annual issues of American Lutherie and get discounts on products. For details, visit the membership page.

If you are already a member, login for access or contact us to setup your account.